Notice of asarco llc asbestos personal injury settlement trust filing deadlines the asarco trust provides this notice to alert claimants counsel to the provisions of section 5. The court finds that the documents asarco and amc want are work product, and that neither party has shown the requisite hardship in order to obtain them. The ninth circuit issued an opinion on june 19, 2018, app. Asarcos bankruptcy filing was precipitated by a mounting. A federal appeals court has ruled that tucsonbased asarco must pay out millions to union workers in copperprice bonuses. Asarco must pay copper bonuses to union workers, court rules. Bankruptcy court in the southern district of texas. Debbie nadler 602 9776593 court approves asarco buyback of mission mill tucson, az february 28, 2007 the u. Brief amicus curiae of the state bar of texas bankruptcy law section filed.
On appeal to the district court, asarco abandoned its. Asarco can hardly consider itself vindicated after the entry of the consent decree filing no. The department of justice and asarco filed five settlement agreement with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas corpus christi division on march, 2009. Asarco files bankruptcy reorganization plan tucson, az tucson based asarco llc asarco announced that it is filing today a plan of reorganization with the u. Asarco originally filed the current case against union pacific in arizona district court. As relevant here, the court held that the firms could recover fees for defending their fee application. Delaware bankruptcy courts foreclose creative attempts to distinguish asarco. Asarco emerged from bankruptcy, the law firms filed fee applica tions requesting fees under 330a1, which permits bankruptcy courts to. On august 9, 2005, asarco filed for reorganization under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code in the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas, corpus christi division. Union pacific slams asarcos filing in basin cleanup row law360.
Asarco ruling continues to rankle bankruptcy practitioners. Manual part b, development of riskbased preliminary. The tenth circuit reversed the district courts dismissal of asarcos cercla claim, holding that the two positions could be reconciled. Whereas, the united states and the state each filed proofs of. Filing 17 motion to sever pursuant to frcp 21 andor motion to dismiss or stay pursuant to the firsttofile rule andor this courts inherent authority to manage its own docket by asarco llc, asarco llc union employee benefits plan. Asarco llc files a 9019 motion for court approval of its global environmental settlements tucson, az asarco llc filed a motion with the u. The arizona district court held a hearing and thereafter transferred the case to the district of. The adobe acrobat reader is available, free, for unix, macintosh, ibm dos, and ibm windows operating systems. The department of justice and asarco filed the settlement agreement with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas corpus christi division on march, 2009.
It also found, as a matter of law, that asarco could not establish that it paid more than its. Asarco and amc can obtain this information in the same way that idaho and prg did, by examining asarcos own records. Prior to the filing of its chapter 11 petition, washington mutual, inc. District judge of the western district of texas, sitting by designation. Arizona nrd final settlement arizona department of environmental. Asarco subsidiaries file chapter 11 proceedings tucson, arizona asarco llc asarco announced today that five nonoperating and dormant subsidiaries of asarco have filed chapter 11 proceedings in bankruptcy court in corpus christi, texas as part of a strategy to invoke special provisions of the bankruptcy code.
The plan implements the previouslyannounced sale of asarcos operating assets to. Asarco filed a petition to vacate arbitration award in the united states district court for the district of arizona. Although the district court ultimately reversed the bankruptcy court, it noted that it is difficult to evaluate prosnaxs reasoning for the hindsight test and that many other courts rejected the fifth circuits approach. Asarco did not challenge the arbitrators findings of fact or conclusions of law, but argued that the noadd provision. Utah 2015 case opinion from the district of utah u. Jun 21, 2018 tucsonbased asarco llc must pay out millions to union workers in copperprice bonuses, the 9th us circuit court of appeals ruled 19 june. Federal court orders asarco to pay wrongfully withheld bonuses. Asarco gets supreme court extension to appeal ruling on employee. Therefore, the bankruptcy court found that professional fees are not to be judged in hindsight.
Union pacific then moved to transfer or dismiss the case. The idaho supreme court reinstated its previous opinion in a brief per curiam order on march 4, 1981. Download the latest version of adobe acrobat reader from adobes web site. The district court found that statement inconsistent with asarcos subsequent contribution claim, because cercla allows for contribution only to the extent a party has paid more than its fair share. A split threejudge panel of the san franciscobased. Mcnamee this week issued a decision to enforce an arbitrators award that asarco pay a negotiated quarterly bonus based on the price of copper to the hundreds of employees hired after june 30, 2011, that. Update 2bankrupt asarco asks court to set bid process. Whereas, asarco filed with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern. Filed united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. Asarco, in which the court ruled that professionals that are paid from a debtors bankruptcy estate cannot be compensated for time spent defending their fee applications, continues to rankle. Superior court against asarco on behalf of aguilar and the state. Feb 05, 2008 update 2bankrupt asarco asks court to set bid process.
Tucsonbased asarco llc must pay out millions to union workers in copperprice bonuses, the 9th us circuit court of appeals ruled 19 june. Guide for online filing describes the process for establishment of a claim file. United states court of appeals fifth circuit f i l e d december 11, 2012. This account holds money from court orders or settlements, and. Oct 25, 2018 filing 10 service executed filed by asarco llc. Whereas, on april 11, 2005, several of asarcos whollyowned direct or indirect subsidiaries the asbestos subsidiary debtors1 filed their voluntary petitions in this court. Aguilar later filed her own suit, alleging sexual harassment under title vii. The plan implements the previouslyannounced sale of asarco s operating assets to sterlite. Asarco appealed various aspects of the award to the district court. Case 0521207 document 10541 filed in txsb on 039 page 3 of 45 whereas, the state of washington has alleged that asarco is a potentially responsible party with respect to the tacoma site. Bankruptcy court in corpus christi, tx yesterday under bankruptcy rule 9019 seeking the court s approval to enter into five settlement. Pittsburgh the united steelworkers usw today said that senior u. District of texas a voluntary petition for relief under title 11 of the united.
It does not appear that the district court ever granted any motion associated with that filing, nor does it appear that amc ever answered, however. Bankruptcy court presid ing over asarco llcs pending chapter 11 reorganization today approved a. The court approved the settlement agreement on june 5, 2009. Consent decree and settlement agreement of state of texas. The plan implements the previouslyannounced sale of asarcos operating assets to sterlite. The district court held that asarco was judicially estopped from pursuing its claim because of representations it made to a bankruptcy court concerning its settlement agreement with the epa for the site in question. Brief amici curiae of bankruptcy law scholars filed. Tucsonbased copper producer asarco llc has won more time to file an appeal with the u. Wmi was a savings and loan holding company, which owned washington mutual bank wmb.
They can be viewed, and printed, with the use of an adobe acrobat reader. Nov 22, 2016 the department of justice and asarco filed five settlement agreement with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas corpus christi division on march, 2009. December 12, 2006, three more asarco subsidiaries the 2006 subsidiary debtors3 filed similar petitions for relief with this court. Therefore, while at issue in the initial stages of these proceedings, all choiceoflaw matters were resolved by agreement by the time of trial. Asarco, then controlled by a company the two law firms successfully sued during the course of the bankruptcy cases, objected. The department of justice and asarco filed the settlement agreement with the united. Summons and complaint and notice of consent to exercise of jurisdiction by magistrate judge upon local unions 88602, 915 and 5252 united steelworkers of america, aflcioclc on 1112018. Asarco must pay copper bonuses totaling millions of dollars, court says. Whereas, the united states has alleged that it has incurred past response costs, and will incur additional future response costs under the comprehensive environmental. The users guide for online filing is available on the trusts website at paper or pdf filing 21. Oct 25, 2018 filing 17 motion to sever pursuant to frcp 21 andor motion to dismiss or stay pursuant to the firsttofile rule andor this court s inherent authority to manage its own docket by asarco llc, asarco llc union employee benefits plan. Bankruptcy court presid ing over asarco llcs pending chapter 11 reorganization today approved a settlement agreement between. Wtiereas, asarco filed with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas a voluntary petition for relief under title 11 of the united states bankruptcy code on august 9, 2005 the asarco bankruptcy case. Before failing, wmb 1 this opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court pursuant to rule 7052 of the.
Date of lodging shall mean the date this consent decree is filed. For the courts complete choiceoflaw analysis, see asarco llc v. Asarco must pay copper bonuses, appeals court rules. Upon receipt of a claim form in paper or pdf format. Union pacific slams asarcos filing in basin cleanup row. The court of appeals for the fifth circuit reversed. The documents provided by the board are adobe acrobat pdf portable document format.
139 129 1054 1121 748 1514 1625 1411 380 901 4 554 702 259 1017 1129 1105 223 318 1270 720 330 1276 1313 1627 1307 161 1028 652 973 58 406 1059 134 477 54 1340 146 15 1400 662 484